About CheckMate
CheckMate is Alle's ClinX's evidence-verification layer. It is designed for situations where several records should agree and a reviewer needs a clear explanation of missing evidence, contradictions or mismatches before acceptance.
Four workflows
Different records, one verification principle.
CheckMate focuses on whether evidence is present and whether the records that should agree actually do.
Product Check
Review product identity, batch/date details, pack information, safety language and evidence-backed claims.
Document Match
Compare records such as labels, SDS, TDS, COA, purchase orders and invoices for cross-document consistency.
Procurement & Delivery
Procurement Review structures supplier evidence; Delivery Match compares approved records with what is received before acceptance.
Workflow
Bring the records. Make the gaps visible.
The current CheckMate model is explainable: a reviewer selects the question, supplies the available records, compares the fields that should agree and then reviews the reason behind each flag.
Start with the decision
Define whether the issue is identity, document consistency, procurement evidence or delivery conformity.
Use the actual evidence
The quality of the check depends on the records supplied. Missing or poor-quality evidence should remain visible rather than being silently inferred.
Review every flag
A flag is a reason to investigate or obtain evidence, not an automatic legal, chemical or quality conclusion.
Limits
Verification is not laboratory testing.
CheckMate can compare records and evidence, but documentary agreement does not prove chemical composition, efficacy or physical conformity where measurement or laboratory testing is required.
Records can agree and still be wrong
Consistent documents do not replace appropriate sampling, measurement, inspection or testing when those controls are required.
Context matters
Acceptance criteria, approved specifications, contractual requirements and site procedures still determine what a reviewer should do with a finding.
Escalate material conflicts
High-impact inconsistencies should be reviewed by the responsible procurement, QA, compliance or supplier team before acceptance.